Meta bets on AI agent Muse to catch up in AI race
Meta's Muse is a personal AI agent designed to handle everyday tasks autonomously, including browsing, filling forms, and negotiating. It represents Meta's latest effort to compete with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google in the AI race. The product is part of a multi-billion dollar strategy overhaul. The Verge reports that Muse can work on its own once given a goal, opening a browser and interacting with services.
Related Tech News
AI CuratedMeta debuts its Muse AI agent. Will consumers trust it?
Meta's Muse AI agent is a new personal assistant that can send emails, book travel, make purchases, and more by connecting to users' apps like email, calendar, and payment services. It is powered by Meta's Muse Spark model and available on web, iOS, Android, and WhatsApp. Free and paid plans ($20/month Power, $100/month Maximum) are offered. However, the launch comes shortly after a $18 billion settlement over social media harms, raising questions about consumer trust in Meta handling personal data.
(PR) Logitech Unveils MX Keypad for Developers: The Customizable Multi-App Control Center
Logitech announced MX Keypad, an AI control center designed for multi-app, multi-agent coding. It offers cross-app compatibility with major coding platforms, unlimited workflow customization, and includes developer-created plugins for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code.
OpenAI fought dirty on career-making math problem, says NYU mathematician
Buckmaster announced proofs made with Anthropic mathematician Levent Alpöge and AI tools, then alleged OpenAI learned of their progress and used massive compute to pursue the same result. OpenAI's Sebastian Bubeck called the claims false and inflammatory.
A new class action lawsuit questions whether Anthropic broke the law by misleading power users
Former FTC attorneys Monica Vaca and Kati Daffan are representing Claude subscribers in an expanded class action alleging Anthropic misled power users about what its top-tier Max subscription includes. The lawsuit claims the company prioritized key customers while deceptively limiting what subscribers received.